Helping Others Rewards You free essay sample

You By: Christopher Prasetya Mulya 7E/05 What is ‘Helping’ means to you? Helping to me is doing something out of kindness of my heart and not expecting for return. Sometimes people don’t realize it, because they were to busy about their own bussiness and didn’t care to others. I’m sure all of you already heard the word ‘Helping’ before. It sounds very easy to do, but actually it’s very difficult indeed. Why? I’m sure when you saw homeless people in the street there is an eager desire to help them, but the problem is we didn’t have courage to translate it in the form of helping others. As a human being, we can’t deny that there must be a problem you are having in your life. From that statement it means that all people need help, but sometimes we don’t want to admit it. We will write a custom essay sample on Helping Others Rewards You or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When we help other people it could make a gigantic impact on their life. For example, I help my lazy friend to study so they can improve their score. By doing that, I could alter them from lazy become a dilligent student. One reason why we have to help others is that we could save other people life. When we donate some clothes that we didn’t use anymore to orphans, unwittingly I just helpped them so they could have new clothes to wear on. Another reason is because it’s beneficial for both side. For example, when we willing to teach our friend in Physics both side will be happy, our friend will be happy cause they can do the test and at the same time we will be more expert in Physics. So, why don’t we just establish a better world to live by helping each other? A person can’t change anything, but a bunch of people that have a high tolerance to others could make an alter in this world. Lets together build our dream place to stay!

Euthanasia Whose Line Is It Anyways Essay free essay sample

Euthanasia ; Whose Line Is It Anyways? Essay, Research Paper The topic of Euthanasia is a het conflict, in which lines have been drawn between warring societal, spiritual and political groups. Many people want this controversial establishment erased from the volumes of lawful medical specialty, but others say that we should be able to take our destinies in utmost instances. Neither the lawgivers of the state nor the people have been able to happen a solution to this argument without doing an intense resistance, and the possibility for an terminal to this war of moralss seems really far in the distance. A definition of mercy killing is, ? a painless violent death, particularly to stop a painful and incurable disease ; mercy killing. ( World Book, p. 733 ) . This knowing expiration of life by another is at the petition of the individual who dies, but like so many other spiritual, societal and political footings, mercy killing has many significances. Passive mercy killing is defined as, the hastening of decease of a individual by retreating some type of support and letting nature take its class, illustrations of this are, taking life support systems, halting medical processs, halting nutrient and H2O, non presenting CPR and allowing the patient? s bosom halt. The most common signifier of inactive mercy killing is to give a individual big doses of morphia to command hurting, despite the likely goon that the hurting slayer would stamp down respiration, therefore doing decease earlier than normal, inactive mercy killing is normally used on patients who are terminally sick, enduring greatly, or in a relentless vegetive province ( Robinson, p. 1 ) . There are three types of mercy killing that are illegal or really close to illegal even in topographic points where mercy killing is permitted. The first is Physician assisted self-destruction. Physician aided self-destruction is when a physician supplies information and/or means of perpetrating self-destruction to a individual, so that they can end their life easy. This type of aid has come to the populace? s oculus as the media has covered the actions of Dr. Jack Kavorkian. Dr. Kavorkian has assisted in the deceases of 100s of patients. 2 Another signifier of mercy killing used by Kavorkian is active mercy killing, this involves doing decease through direct action, in response to a patient? s petition ; fundamentally a clemency killing. A good documented instance of this is the decease of a patient with Lou Gherig? s disease by Dr. Kavorkian. Kavorkian injected the patient with controlled substances that resulted in his decease, Kavorkian was found guilty of 2nd degree slaying in March of 1999. The last signifier of mercy killing is nonvoluntary mercy killing, nil but a euphemism for slaying ( Robinson, p.2 ) . There are two major beliefs refering mercy killing, the traditional spiritual and societal beliefs, and the more broad. Traditional faith condemns all self-destruction, assisted or non, because it violates the natural desire to populate, it harms other people, and life is the gift of God and therefore can merely be taken by God. The other major point of view argues that self-destruction is a affair of personal pick and that it is rational under some fortunes. These two places remain virtually the same today. Euthanasia is merely one of the many heatedly debated subjects of our clip which revolve around personal pick. The other two outstanding subjects are whether homosexuals and tribades should be given a pick of whether to get married and should adult females be allowed a pick to abort their unborn kids. All three of these inquiries are emotional laden and have entered the political and judicial systems. The issues become muddied when they are no longer the person? s and go society? s determination. Many believe that euthanasia marks the most vulnerable of human existences when they are no longer in a place of doing proper determinations. Ultimately, I believe, that mercy killing is a inquiry of pick. Each of us should be empowered to hold pick over our ain organic structures and that pick includes the right to non populate if life is non traveling to keep the self-respect that we feel is necessary for life. Due to statute law, you do non hold a right to take unless you live in Columbia, 3 Japan, the Netherlands, or the province of Oregon ( Robinson, p.2 ) .. It does non count what your life is like or how much hurting you may be in. The resistance to euthanasia comes from many topographic points: preserve spiritual groups, frequently the same who oppose entree to abortion ; medical organisations whose members are dedicated to salvaging and widening life ; and groups concerned with disablements who fear that mercy killing is the first measure towards a society that will kill handicapped people against their will. Group that promote entree to assisted self-destruction seem to publicise instances where people have terminal unwellness or are in intractable hurting, and want to stop their life. Although such instances do be, they are in a little minority. The bulk of individual s that are deceasing are likely persons whose quality of life has shrunk to zero or those who find the indignities of being cared for hard to bear. They would wish to take to decease with self-respect before they become sicker and go a greater load on their loved 1s. Unfortunately. groups on all sides have scare tactics. They do non assail the issues straight, but feed the media to dismay the populace. These methods may work on the short term to convey the issue to the head but I do non believe the will work in the long tally. Finally, each individual will necessitate to make up ones mind on their ain and disregard the media ballyhoo. Some groups in the pro-choice cabal have described awful instances of terminally sick persons, enduring awfully in intractable hurting, even though such instances are non the norm. Some of the pro life groups have been connoting that doctors have become liquidators. That physicians will acquire out of manus and Begin to kill off those that they believe are non worthy of life. There are many issues refering mercy killing. One of the most prevailing statements is whether the province has the right to deny a individual the right to take their ain life. Another statement is whether the ill have every bit much right to take as the 4 healthy. The most prevailing statement is centered around faith. Many people feel that it is against their spiritual beliefs for a individual to take their ain lives, but should they be allowed to enforce that belief on person who does non experience this manner? I do non believe that it is just for determinations to be made about their life based on beliefs that they do non keep. Religion is one of the most prevailing factors in the argument of mercy killing. On the anti-euthanasia side of the conflict is the more conservative spiritual groups including ; The Christian reformed church, Islam, the Lutheran church, the Mennonites, Orthodox Christianity, Orthodox Judaism and The Roman Catholic church. These groups and many others have two chief statements refering mercy killing ; the first is, that life is a gift from God, and that each person is its steward, therefore, merely God can get down a life, and merely God can stop one ; An person who commits self-destruction is hence perpetrating a wickedness. The 2nd statement is that God does non direct us any experience that we can non manage ; God supports people in enduring ; to actively seek an terminal to one? s life would be a deficiency of trust in God? s promise ( Euthanasia, p.2 ) . The resistance to this side comes from groups including broad Christians, humanists, secularists, doubters, atheists, non-christians, and others who do non accept the theologically based statements. Their statements can be summed up in two statements ; The first is that each individual has autonomy over their ain life, individuals whose quality of life is nonexistent should hold the right to make up ones mind to perpetrate self-destruction, and to seek aid if necessary. The 2nd statement is sometimes terminal unwellness causes life to be an intolerable load ; decease can stand for a alleviation of unbearable hurting. The chief political inquiry is whether persons should be allowed to take self-destruction, or whether they should be forced to follow the theological beliefs of the dominant faith. This point is similar to that raised in treatments on 5 pick in abortion and supplication in public schools. At what point does the church and province convergences? Many polls have been taken to research the public sentiment on mercy killing. However, the the consequences vary harmonizing to the precise inquiry asked. A canvass taken by CNN/USA Today in 1997 shows that the support of mercy killing pick is, 57 % in favour, and 35 % opposed. Given this statistic, one would presume mercy killing to be a legal pick, but still it is legal merely in the province of Oregon. Lone clip will state whether mercy killing will go a legal pick nationally, but for now, the conflict still rages on. Plants Sited Egan, Timothy. ? Oregon? s Assisted-Suicide Law Threatened by a Technicality. ? The New York Times. USA: November 19, 1997. ? Euthanasia, Synod of the Great Lakes, Reformed Church in America? at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.euthanasia.com/lakes.html Horgan, John. ? The Right to Die. ? Scientific American. USA: 1996. Mullens, Anne. Seasonably Death. USA: Knopf, 1996. Reed, Christopher. ? Oregon Tackles Mercy Killing. ? Globe and Mail Newspaper. Toronto: November 6, 1997. ? Religion and The Right to Die. ? at: hypertext transfer protocol: //euthanasia.org/religion.html Robinson, Bruce. ? Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide. ? All Sides of the Issues. at http.//religioustolerance.org World Book Dictionary. Chicago: Childcraft International, 1982. Euthanasia: Who Should Decide? by Matt Baber American Government January 5, 1999

Sample of a Project Essay

Sample of a Project EssayA sample of a project essay is usually given to an essay writer by the school. They give it to them so that they can have a base and then work with the advice that they are given.For instance, a student in college goes to their professor and wants to get some advice on a thesis for school. The teacher gives the student a sample of a project. The student then reads over this and uses some of the examples from the material provided. This is where the student starts to think about a problem or a question they have and try to think of a solution.The essays are also available online for the student to use in writing their own essay. The main difference between a project and an essay is that an essay will have a beginning, middle and end.The first section of the project will be the outline of the project. This is where you write out all of the objectives and what you plan to do with the project.The second section will be the actual research that you will do. This w ill include the reading material, information that is needed for your thesis, what you want to use as your example and then the methodology that you will use for your research. You will also include the main points of your project and how these points are related to your topic.The third section is the actual research that you will conduct. This will include the names of the resources that you used and where you got them from. The most important part is to make sure that you have included all of the facts that you needed to complete your research.Lastly, you will put the conclusion of your project. This is the conclusion of your project and should outline exactly what you did in your research and why it is important.As you can see, a project essay will have three sections. The first section will help you make your research more organized and the second section will show you what you have researched. The third section will highlight your conclusions and state why it is important.

Alcoholism Essays (1948 words) - Alcohol Abuse, Free Essays

Alcoholism Essays (1948 words) - Alcohol Abuse, Free Essays Alcoholism CUNNING, BAFFLING, POWERFUL, PATIENT AND DEADLY Alcoholism: Today's substance abuse, whether alcohol or drugs, continues to be a major social problem. Common patterns occur in all forms of substance abuse. While some types of substance abuse problems are slightly different in terms of causes and cures, experts agree that there are some do's and don'ts which relate to kicking the abuse habit. If you or a loved one have a substance abuse problem, this article can give you sound advice on understanding what substance abuse is, and what to do about it. In this article, we will refer to alcohol, although the word drug may be used synonymously in place of alcohol. What is Alcoholism? Alcoholism is a primary, chronic disease with genetic, psychosocial, and environmental factors influencing its development and manifestations. The disease is often progressive and fatal. It is characterized by continuous or periodic: impaired control over drinking, preoccupation with the drug alcohol, use of alcohol despite adverse consequences, and distortions in thinking, most notably denial. The rational for continued use of alcohol is centered on, Common addiction distortions. MENTAL FILTER:Magnify the negative details and eliminate the positive.E.g. - using alcohol is so incredible. It is the most pleasurable thing I know. (filter out the negative effects) POLARIZED THINKING: Things are black and white, good or bad. You are perfect or a complete failure.E.g. - My life would be void of pleasure with out alcohol. OVERGENERAL- ZATIONTo come to a general conclusion based on a single incident or piece of evidence.E.g. - Alcohol has made for some great times with friends. I must have alcohol in order to capitalize on the potential for fun. MIND READINGYou think you are able to define how people are thinking about you.E.g. - People will not like me if I give up alcohol. There is a side that come out that is very attractive. CATASTROPHIC EXAGGERATIONYou expect disaster, and disaster means the end of the world. E.g. - I won't be able to tolerate the discomfort of sobriety I AM CONTROLLEDYou feel externally controlled, you see yourself as helpless and a victim of fate. E.g. - The alcohol makes my days tolerable, without it, I'll not be able to function. I MUST CONTROLYou feel that control is an all or nothing thing. Any ease on the reins will result in a fall so disastrous you will never regain control.E.g. - Without alcohol I may get depressed, and I will never be able to come out of it. BLAMINGYou hold other people responsible for your pain.E.g. - If I give up my drinking, I will be a bare wire, forced to face my abuse riddled past. These are common patterns of substance addiction, keeping in mind that most alcoholics are unwilling to admit they are real alcoholics and fit into one or more of these categories. No person likes to think he is bodily and mentally different from other people. Therefore, it is not surprising that their drinking careers have been characterized by countless vain attempts to prove they could drink like other people. The idea that somehow, someday they will control and enjoy their drinking is the great obsession of every abnormal drinker. The persistence of this illusion is astonishing. Many pursue it into the gates of insanity or death. The John Hopkins University Hospital in Baltimore uses the following questions as a test for alcoholism. #YesNo 1Do you loose time from work due to drinking? 2Is drinking making your home life unhappy? 3Do you drink because you are shy with other people? 4Is drinking affecting you reputation? 5Have you ever felt remorse after drinking? 6Have you gotten into financial difficulties as a result of drinking? 7Do you turn to lower companions and an inferior environment when drinking? 8Does your drinking make you careless of your family's welfare? 9Has your ambition decreased since drinking? 10Do you crave a drink at a definite time daily? 11Do you want a drink the next morning? 12Does drinking cause you to have difficulty in sleeping? 13Has your efficiency decreased since drinking? 14Is drinking jeopardizing your job or business? 15Do you drink to escape from worries or troubles? 16Do you drink alone? 17Have you ever had a complete loss of memory because of drinking? 18Has your physician ever treated you for drinking? 19Do you drink to build your self-confidence? 20Have you ever been to a hospital or institution on account of

Definition and Examples of Gibberish

Definition and Examples of Gibberish Gibberish is unintelligible, nonsensical, or meaningless language. Similarly, gibberish may refer to speech or writing thats needlessly obscure or pretentious. In this sense, the term is similar to gobbledygook. Gibberish is often used in a playful or creative way- as when a parent speaks to an infant or when a child experiments with combinations of vocal sounds that have no meaning. The word itself is sometimes used as a term of disdain for a foreign or unknown language or for the speech of a particular individual (as in Hes talking gibberish).   Grammalot is a particular type of gibberish that was originally used by medieval jesters and troubadours. According to  Marco Frascari, Grammalot consists of a few real words, interspersed with nonsense syllables mimicking the sound  utterances to convince the audience  that it is a real known language.   Examples Gliddy glup gloopyNibby nabby noopyLa la la lo lo.Sabba sibby sabbaNooby abba nabbaLee lee lo lo.Tooby ooby wallaNooby abba nabbaEarly morning singing song. (Chorus to Good Morning Starshine, by  Galt MacDermot,  James Rado, and  Gerome Ragni. Hair, 1967)Thrippsy pillivinx,Inky tinky pobblebockle abblesquabs? - Flosky! beebul trimble flosky! - Okul scratchabibblebongibo, viddle squibble tog-a-tog, ferrymoyassity amsky flamsky ramsky damsky crocklefether squiggs.Flinkywisty pommSlushypipp  (Edward Lear, letter to  Evelyn Baring, 1862)God what a husband Id make! Yes, I should get married!So much to do! like sneaking into Mr Jones house late at nightand cover his golf clubs with 1920 Norwegian books . . .And when the milkman comes leave him a note in the bottlePenguin dust, bring me penguin dust, I want penguin dust. (Gregory Corso, Marriage, 1958)Lt. Abbie Mills: Chopping down a Christmas tree?Ichabod Crane: Altogether a nonsensical concept. Celebrating Yuletide with a titu lar display of lumber.Lt. Abbie Mills: Wow. Bah-humbug to you too, Ebenezer.Ichabod Crane: That was all gibberish.Lt. Abbie Mills: Scrooge. A Dickensian character. A grump. (The Golem, Sleepy Hollow, 2013) Still through the hawthorn blows the cold wind:Says suum, mun, ha, no, nonny.Dolphin my boy, my boy, sessa! let him trot by. (Edgar in William Shakespeares  King Lear, Act 3, Scene 4)I encourage teachers to speak in their own voices. Dont use the gibberish of the standards writers. (Jonathan Kozol in an interview with  Anna Mundow, The Advocate of Teaching Over Testing. The Boston Globe, October 21, 2007)   Etymology of Gibberish - The exact origin of  the word gibberish  is unknown, but one explanation traces its beginnings to an eleventh-century Arab named Geber, who practiced a form of magical chemistry called alchemy. To avoid getting into trouble with church officials, he invented strange terms that prevented others from understanding what he was doing. His mysterious language (Geberish) may have given rise to the word gibberish. (Laraine Flemming, Words Count, 2nd ed. Cengage, 2015) - Etymologists have been scratching their heads over [the origin of the word gibberish] almost since it first appeared in the language in the middle 1500s. There’s a set of words- gibber, jibber, jabber, gobble and gab (as in gift of the gab)- that may be related attempts at imitating incomprehensible utterances. But how they arrived and in what order is unknown. (Michael Quinion, World Wide Words, October 3, 2015) Charlie Chaplins Gibberish in The Great Dictator   - [Charlie] Chaplins performance as Hynkel [in the film The Great Dictator] is a tour de force, one of his greatest performances of all, and certainly his greatest performance in a sound film.* He is able to get around the arbitrary and limited meaning which dialogue implies by screeching his vaudevillian German doubletalk of utter gibberishthe result is sound without defined meaning...the finest weapon by which to satirize the disturbing and disturbed speeches of Hitler as seen in the newsreels. (Kyp Harness,  The Art of Charlie Chaplin. McFarland, 2008)- Gibberish captures that foundational static out of which wording arises...[I]t is my view that gibberish is an education onto the relation of sound to speech, sense to nonsense; it reminds us of the primary phonetic noise by which we learn to articulate, and from which we might draw from again, in acts of parody, poetry, romance, or storytelling, as well as through the simple pleasures of a disordered semantic.Here Id like to bring into consideration Charlie Chaplins use of gibberish in the film The Great Dictator. Produced in 1940 as a critical parody of Hitler, and the rise of the Nazi regime in Germany, Chaplin uses the voice as a primary vehicle for staging the brutal absurdity of the dictators ideological views. This appears immediately in the opening scene, where the first lines spoken by the dictator (as well as by Chaplin, as this was his first talking film) wields an unforgettable force of effusive gibberish: Democrazie schtunk! Liberty schtunk! Freisprechen schtunk! Chaplins nonsensical enactments throughout the film highlight language as a material susceptible to mutation, appropriation, and poetical transfiguration that no less delivers potent meaning. Such oral moves on the part of Chaplin reveal to what degree gibberish may perform to supply the thrust of speech with the power of critique. (Brandon LaBelle,  Lexicon of the Mouth: Poetics and Politics of Voice and the Oral Imaginary. Bloomsbury, 2014) Frank McCourt on Gibberish and Grammar If you said to someone, John store to the went, theyd think it was gibberish.Whats gibberish?Language that makes no sense.I had a sudden idea, a flash. Psychology is the study of the way people behave. Grammar is the study of the way language behaves...I pushed it. If someone acts crazy, the psychologist studies them to find out whats wrong. If someone talks in a funny way and you cant understand them, then youre thinking about grammar. Like,  John store to the went...No stopping me now. I said,  Store the to went John. Does that make sense? Of course not. So you see, you have to have words in their proper order. Proper order means meaning and if you dont have meaning youre babbling and the men in the white coats come and take you away. They stick you in the gibberish department of Bellevue. Thats grammar. (Frank McCourt,  Teacher Man: A Memoir. Scribners, 2005) The Lighter Side of Gibberish Homer Simpson: Listen to the man, Marge. He pays Barts salary. Marge Simpson: No, he doesnt. Homer Simpson: Why dont you ever support my gibberish? Id do it if you were stupid.(How Munched Is That Birdie in the Window? The Simpsons, 2010)

Administrative Ethics-HIPAA Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Administrative Ethics-HIPAA - Essay Example The specifics of these objectives are highlighted under Title II and I respectively. Section one embodies the protection of health covers for workers and their families. This part is meant to ensure easy transfer of health insurance covers from an old employer to a new employer or at least guarantee the continuation of cover in the event of job loss. On the other hand, section II details administrative specifics under Administrative Simplification (AS) (Banks, 2006). The AS section dictates requirements in establishing nationwide standards, which define the manner in which healthcare transactions are conducted electronically. It also defines the specific identifiers for employers, insurance plans and healthcare providers. This section helps simplify administrative challenges emerging from requirements of portability. The AS section also addresses issues of privacy and security of patients’ information and records. Since its ambitious implementation, HIPAA has expanded its infl uence on to major health issues such as security, confidentiality, privacy and simplification (Banks, 2006). In a nutshell, HIPAA promises an effective and efficient mode of disseminating and sharing electronic information in the healthcare sector. The compliance deadline was 2003 and a slight extension for harmonization of some minor plans. Since 2003, the plan has gained widespread adherence by various players including health insurers, employer sponsored healthcare plans, healthcare service providers and clearing houses in the sector. In spite of its positive outlook and gains made, HIPAA still raises numerous challenges with regard to its implementation. This paper reviews one of the significant challenges in HIPAA’s implementation by highlighting a newspaper article covering the issue of disclosure. The article under highlight appeared in the New York Times on 3rd July, 2007. The piece of work by Jane Gross is titled â€Å"Keeping Patients’ Details Private, Even From Kin.† Disclosure Issues in HIPAA’s Implementation HIPAA dictates the rules of disclosure and non-disclosure for Protected Health Information (PHI). However, Gross (2007), indicates that a number of studies have shown that a number of healthcare providers are applying HIPAA inappropriately. These providers and practitioners under them apply the regulations overzealously by being excessively and unnecessarily prohibitive. These acts have left caretakers, family members, law enforcement officers and public health officers unable to access information that is essential for their operations and life. Gross’ article presents this challenge by citing various real-life situations in which family members have been barred from staying with their kin or assessing their treatment chart information while undergoing treatment. Gross cites Mr. Nussbaum’s case in which he was barred from staying with his father or checking his treatment chart as an example of misinte rpretation of the act (Gross, 2007). A similar case involving Ms. Banks saw her drive from Oklahoma to Tampa to get information about her mother because this could not be disclosed over the . On arrival, she had to spend another 24 hours before she could get the disclosure from the doctor involved, simply because the nurse feared going against HIPAA (Gross, 2007). These examples show the frustrations that family and other parties such as researchers have when seeking patient information. The bigger challenge is that while there are â€Å"good faith nondisclosures,† there are also numerous cases of â€Å"bad faith nondisclosures† that unnecessarily bar access to information. For example,

Allergic Asthma Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Allergic Asthma - Case Study Example In 2001, 73 people per 1000 were diagnosed to have chronic allergic asthma with the help of the medical professional; this is current prevalence of allergic asthma. What is more interesting to note, is that the prevalence of allergic asthma among minorities is disproportionably higher than among the native population. This may be explained by the social conditions, which often define the general state of health and immune system among patients from ethnic minorities. Asthma was also one of the leading diagnoses in the hospitalizations, and its morbidity was equal to 1.6 per 100,000 of the native population. Thus, accounting the noted information the importance and relevance of the present discussion is not under any doubt. (Adams, Smith & Ruffin, 2001) first of all, the process of diagnosis and its confirmation is clinical, and there are no blood tests, histopathological or radiographic investigations which can be performed to confirm the suggested asthma. Mrs. H addressed the doctor for medical assistance in 2004. ... sence of wheeze during these periods were the signs of the asthma, but for the reasons of her addressing the medical establishment with this problem for the first time, there had been no previous notes in relation to her state. She was 29, and she had used to have such health problems for about 10 years before, but with the exacerbations passing quickly and with long breaks she didn't see the reason for serious medication. Mrs H's family history stated that her both parents had chronic allergic rhinitis. Mrs H herself noted that tobacco smoke worsened her state, as well as dust inhaling; she had never smoked herself. Her social status was favorable, and her profession was accounting, thus she used to work with papers which could often be the sources of dust. She didn't have any signs of breath difficulties after use of aspirin or other medicines. Wheeze was episodic but was becoming more frequent. It is useful to remember, that the symptoms of allergic asthma may sometimes be mixed with the other symptoms, which may make the diagnosis doubtful or wrong; if the patient has difficulties in breathing without wheeze, fixed wheeze, or mentions the weight loss, the chest X-ray is recommended for the determining of the exact diagnosis, which in such case may be either COPD, or tumor, bronchiectasis, etc. As for the family history in diagnosing allergic asthma, it is one of the most important risk factors to account when diagnosing any allergic diseases; 'asthma is linked to both parental and sibling history. The strongest association is with maternal atopy'. (British Thoracic Society, 1997) Diagnosis of asthma with the account of theoretical knowledge Bearing in mind that Mrs H didn't have any additional symptoms which could make the diagnosis doubtful, she was asked to